It’s harvest! It’s harvest! It’s harvest!
admin | Jul 29, 2009 | Comments 5
I’m kind of welching on last week’s promise. I told you this week I would talk about Gary Loomis’ message and CCA (Coastal Conservation Association).
I say “kind of” because I sat there like a dummy as he talked to me and I didn’t take notes. Some reporter, huh?
I’ll write what I remember from Gary’s talk, but I’ll fill in the holes with stuff I know. We’re told the problem with salmon and steelhead recovery is fourfold – Hatcheries, Hydro, Harvest and Habitat – but Gary says it’s harvest, it’s harvest, it’s harvest.
I believe that and that’s why I worked so hard for passage of two different initiatives that would have curbed commercial harvest here in Washington state. They were both defeated. That’s because, in my opinion, the average voter looks on commercial fishermen as one of the last great adventurers. He’s the cowboy of yesteryear and at least one popular TV series bolsters that image.
It makes me wonder if market hunters of yesteryear were also looked on with such romance. And even though we stopped market hunting because the resource couldn’t stand the pressure, we seem to think fish can. We ignore the numbers and keep right on netting. It’s all about harvest. Gary explained to me why the survival rate for hatchery salmon and steelhead is small as compared to wild fish. In a nutshell, it’s this: Wild smolts know how to forage and they hit the salt water on their out migration full of vigor. Hatchery fish hit the salt weakened because on their trip downriver, they don’t find pellets being sprinkled on top of the water and they don’t know how to forage.
That, Gary says, explains why, even though millions of hatchery fry are released, about half the fish returning to spawn are wild. They’re stronger fish and we need to preserve and enhance wild fish stocks. That’s why sports fishermen must release wild fish unharmed, but a gill net can’t tell the difference. It’s all about harvest. It’s loss of habitat, we’re told. That explains low salmon and steelhead returns. But for the last 50 years, habitat has gotten better while fish returns got worse.
Loggers can no longer cut to the stream bank and that’s good for fish returning to spawn. Streams are no longer channeled and that’s good. Logs and rocks are left in rivers to offer shade and protection for fish and that’s good, but the returns keep getting smaller.
More than a dozen runs of fish are classed as endangered, but those runs are fished commercially and you can buy them at the grocery store. Can you name one other endangered species we can legally eat? It’s all about harvest. Hydro? Hydro is dams. We’re told dams are causing fish to disappear. Gary answers that charge with a question and then he gives the answer: “What do dammed and undammed rivers have in common? No fish.”
It’s all about harvest. That’s the message Gary took to Washington, D.C., when he got a half-hour appointment to speak with a high-ranking official in the Bush administration.
He flew back, talked with the official for 55 minutes and left him saying, “I think you’re right, Gary. It’s harvest.”
When I was a kid growing up in Oroville, a run of sockeye salmon came up the Okanogan River. We called them bluebacks, the smallest of the salmon family. And they’re still coming. They leave the ocean and swim at least 700 miles, cross nine (count ‘em!) major dams on the Columbia River, cross another small one at Oroville, swim the length (eight miles) of Lake Osoyoos and spawn in Canada.
So, don’t tell me dams are the cause of ever-decreasing runs of salmon and steelhead.
It’s all about harvest and gill nets are unforgiving harvesters. There is virtually no such thing as releasing a fish alive once he’s in a gill net and those nets don’t care if they kill targeted fish or not.
It’s euphemistically called “by catch,” this string of dead fish the nets trail behind them. Many countries, including Russia, have banned them and they’re banned in many areas in the U.S. They killed almost all the codfish before commercial harvest was curbed.
The redfish were about gone along our southern coast until the nets were banned.
Now, the fish are making a strong comeback.
A century and a half ago, Atlantic salmon was fished almost to extinction, so the commercials, along with their canneries, moved to the west coast and began attacking our salmon. And, about the time of Custer’s last stand, when runs went to almost nothing in some Oregon rivers, they began building hatcheries.
Today, hatcheries subsidize the nets and commercial fisheries sell fish for much less than it costs taxpayers and electrical rate payers to produce them. Gary is right when he says “It’s harvest! It’s harvest! It’s harvest!” He’s the chief spokesman for the Coastal Conservation Association here in the northwest and I believe him when he says that organization is our last chance to save the salmon.
For more information, go to www.ccapnw.org.
Filed Under: Jim Pearson
About the Author:











Gary Loomis is not telling the truth
Why don’t you get the facts by calling Doug Milward, WDFW in Olympia. Doug will be more than glad to clue you in as to who is harvesting how many Salmon. Doug’s number is 360 902 2739
Did Gary tell you he met with George W Bush and showed W how to use a Loomis Rod?
He is not being truthful. You need the whole story.
Please Print the Truth!
Thanks Don
P.S. If you have an email address I can provide additional info.
It’s just wonderful that, based on an interview with one activist, your journalist has definitively addressed in 17 paragraphs a problem that has vexed hundreds of scientists for nearly a century.
As brilliant as he is, he got at least one fact wrong when he claimed Russia has banned gillnets. I just returned from a month in Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka, the latest of several fisheries-related trips I’ve made to Russia, where the regional fisheries agencies continue to issue permits to Russian and Japanese companies to gillnet for salmon in the Russian economic zone, a practice never allowed in the U.S.
Gillnets in Russia are not in terminal areas as they are in the US.
You don’t have to go any further than Puget Sound to confirm what Gary says - there are few hydro dams, most of the spawning/rearing habitat is available and underutilized. And yet there are no fish. Best available science (google Hatchery Scientific Review Group if you are interested) confirms what this article says, and correctly attributes to Gary. Mr. Loomis has taken on himself to accomplish what politicians haven’t been able to by throwing billions (literally) of our tax dollars at. We have improved habitat, made modifications to dams, produced more hatchery fish, and yet the declines continue. It’s time to address the 4th “H” - selective harvest isn’t to catch fewer fish, it is to catch MORE fish - Hatchery fish, while protecting the wild fish.
Hard as it is to believe, it really is that simple.
As a sportfisherman for salmon, I like harvest. Sustainable harvest. I’m not sure what Gary thinks his rods are going to be used for once we eliminate harvest. Even catch and release has associated mortality of fish. What is this guy thinking?
Nobody catches the sockeye that once swam into redfish lake in Idaho but they are basically gone. Look at the numbers commercial salmon fisherman catch, less fish than ever before, but numbers still decline. How about we listen to biologists not some fat guy trying to sell a few pricey fishing rods. And by the way, in Oregon we troll. no nets, hook comes out fish swims away